Awaiting reviewer scores after minor revision. I don't know what this means and why it is taking so long.

Awaiting reviewer scores after minor revision. Do I just keep waiting, send another email? .

• Awaiting reviewer scores after minor revision I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again Awaiting Reviewer Scores means that your paper is being peer reviewed. Now, the status has changed to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores. 2022. The Manuscript Status on ScholarOne displays “Waiting for Reviewers’ Scores” if one or more agreed reviewers have not submitted their scores. The paper status has changed from "major revision" to "with editor" after submitting the revised paper. Months later I received a "Minor Revision". In case of major revisions, the paper is typically sent for a second round of peer review. After a week the status changed to “Under Review”. Reviewer status and be badged as a training graduate on our reviewer selection system, making it more likely that you will be selected to review. 01 awaiting reviewer invitation 22. Peer reviewers are given 2 weeks to submit their review of your article. You can register for free here: Peer Review Excellence. Revisions of papers with a "Major revision" decision should be resubmitted within at most three months. 30 Accept Later, it has been under "Awaiting review scores" for the past 25 days. We have developed some helpful tips to guide you through the revision process. I think awaiting reviewers' scores after revision means that your response to the queries raise is under Aug 7, 2017 · We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. Most journals will try to catch this and either reject outright, or assign it to the same AE to handle. 5 AE assignment 10. How long I should wait for the final verdict? I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again If the editorial management system (EMS) is distinguishing between the two, odds are "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" means the reviewers have not been invited yet, and "Awaiting Reviewer Confirmation" means the reviewers have not agreed to review the manuscript yet. The Society offers leading research in nature-inspired problem solving, including neural networks, evolutionary I submitted my manuscript to Management Science. The status of the paper changed several times. As you may know, peer review can take a while, as peer reviewers do this along with their other work. Then the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation" after a month. But I remember that approximately one and a half months later is "awaiting reviewer scores. Revisions of papers with a "Minor revision" should be resubmitted with a month. The manuscript has made significant progress from the first submission to publication. 23 Resubmitted 10. 10 awaiting EIC decision; Peer review scores have been sent to the editor and the status is awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks now. 08. 5 awaiting reviewer scores 3. Congratulations! Article status went from Awaiting Decision back to Awaiting Reviewer Scores . 04. BJU International is a company limited by guarantee, incorporated in England, and is a charity. there were two reviewers, reviewer#1 said `The authors have made all the modifications indicated. Major Revision: The manuscript may be accepted with major revisions. " Does it really mean that my paper will go through another round of review with new reviewers? I was told that for paper with "minor revision," it is likely like it will not be sent back to the reviewers. Since then the status changed to "awaiting referee scores" then a bit later to "awaiting recommendation", which was the status for about two weeks, and a few days ago it changed back to "awaiting referee scores". Major revision on February 7, 2022. 21 accepted Translation: 8. 25 Minor Revision 11. Last week I sent a gentle reminder to the editor and got no response. 3 reviewers gave minor revisions, less than 20 comments 10. However, the Aug 8, 2014 Jul 15, 2019 · Thus the follow-on status “under review” means that the manuscript has been sent get with review. Reviewers are normally asked to submit their comments within 60 (calendar) days in which to carry out a first review. 26 awaiting AE recommendation 22. 4 May Minor Revision - Minor revision on 4th May 7 May Submit revised manuscript - Submit revised manuscript on 7th May 2 Jun Accepted - Accepted on 2nd June 2023. To request extensions for revisions. But until now, 5/17, the status are still "awaiting decision". If you can, be on hand to talk through the piece of homework. Still the status is same. Translation: 21. After six months, I received the reviews and was asked to do major revisions. Do I just keep waiting, send another email? Thank you. Desk reject after "awaiting reviewer selections" status. You mention that the status is “Awaiting reviewer selection” under “Minor revision” and you also mention that you re After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. 30 Minor Revision - Minor revision required on May 30th 6. 15 Awaiting EIC decision 1. The reason the manuscripts do this is because there are still open invitations Accept after minor revision (no further review): At least one reviewer recommends “Accept after minor revision (no further review)”, and no I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again My revised manuscript (after minor revision) is still under review for more than 3 months and I have not any response yet. 1. 3. It is quite normal for a revised paper to be reviewed once again. 18. After a couple of days, the status changed from "Awaiting AE assignment" to "Under Review". Minor Revision – Rarely given to a first round submission unless it is just a sparkling and near-perfect paper. Note that the time it takes for an editor to I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again After more than a year of passing through review > major review > review > minor revision > review, the status has been ‘Awaiting EIC decision’ for the past 20 days. 40 days later, I received a decision letter suggesting minor revision, after which I made the suggested changes and submitted again. 03. I think awaiting reviewers' scores after revision means that your response to the queries raise is under Sep 7, 2021 · In your case, it is possible that the revised manuscript was taken up by an editor/associate Once a revised paper is submitted, the editor can choose to send it for another round of peer review or review it himself/herself. Meaning of ‘Awaiting reviewer scores’ (AE) will make a decision on your manuscript, such as to ask you to revise and resubmit (for a minor or major revision) or to reject the manuscript. 10 Awaiting reviewer scores 11. (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half Papers at the ‘Assign Reviewers’ and ‘Awaiting Reviewer Scores’ stage in your AE/CE dashboard are awaiting responses from the reviewers. Now the handling editor assigned to your manuscript will go through the reviewers comments and decide the next steps for the manuscript i. 23 Accept - Accepted on July 23rd Awaiting Reviewer Scores && Awaiting SE Recommendation Awaiting Reviewer Scores && Awaiting EIC Decision Reject && Resubmit For a minor revision, the editor may decide to send the revised manuscript to the peer reviewer for a final check or review the manuscript themselves if the changes were indeed minor. In that case, will it be communicated directly to us (by the managing editor) or even request for revisions/clarifications will also . So, why has it returned to I submitted a paper to some journal. I don't understand what this means. Related reading: What does a status change from "Awaiting reviewer score" back to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" mean? Peer Review in Progress. What the "awaiting reviewer scores" most plausibly means here is that the reviews are now due! 4 weeks is also the time I'd expect the AE to allot for the reviewers (from past experience), and so the timing is right for the status to A third reason for inviting new referees might be a reject from the final reviewer after your minor revision (assuming the editor had send it out again). Answer: The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editor has sent out reviewer invitations. However, after a few days, I got a desk reject notification. 5 resubmitted 11. Your article has secured the minimum number of required reviewers. TMI allows reviewers three weeks – may be extended per request – to complete the review. 29 awaiting admin processing 9. The AE is the most responsible AE I have ever encountered. e A rejected paper is sometimes resubmitted to the same journal, after some revisions. « I submitted a manuscript to a journal that uses the ScholarOne system. Fifth review on 23rd January, accepted after minor revision. It is almost 5 months since resubmission. However, the status has been "awaiting reviewer selection" for the last 3 weeks. 2023. 5 minor revision 2022. As per my understanding, the status should be Awaiting EIC Decision. I want to know how long will this status last. Although in my earlier submission of other papers in the same journal, in this time frame, my paper went into review process. In this case, however, the status went back to under review after I resubmitted. I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again 2022. According to the publishing office, they can’t find a reviewer. 12. I just submitted a revised paper to ScholarOne (minor revision). So, one can’t really put a timeline to it. 12 Awaiting AE Recommendation 5. Does this mean it got sent to reviewers or the editor is evaluating it? Any experience here? It’s an Elsevier journal. 13 AE Recommendation 3. 29 submitted after major revision 22. 04 Awaiting Reviewer Selection 12. 28 Awaiting EA Decision 6. Late July accepted after minor revision Mid-August accepted s4425838 2022-07-19 I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again After undergoing a major revision, the paper was successfully accepted. There are several decisions that authors may receive after submitting their paper to one of the Society’s journals: Reject without review: The Action Editor has rejected the paper without sending it for peer review. However you can make it clear that the paper is likely to be accepted in the future. 25 Awaiting EIC decision 01. The decision letter is delivered to the author via email. Sixth review on 22. 14 Awaiting AE recommendation 01. July 10, 2023, acceptance. What to do when two months after submitting a major revision, its status is still "Editor Assigned"? What does it mean that the status of a submitted major revision is simultaneously 'awaiting reviewer scores' and 'awaiting decision'? 2. After 1 week later the paper status has changed to "under review" and then after two weeks later the paper status has changed to "with editor". Reviewer 1 says to accept with minor revisions, reviewer 2 says to reject without recourse. The requirements for figures and tables were high and very rigorous. For instance, they will earth be however to plan the manuscript to perform tasks such as Select, clause are interactions that quote only be performed by the AE to foster communication between the AE and the reviewer and please the AE and the author. Minor revisions should be verified by the AE and not sent 23. . "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" after "Acceptance with Minor Revision I have resubmitted a paper which was revised which needed minor revisions, but the status remains “Awaiting Reviewer Assignment” for 5 weeks. I submitted the revision almost 2 months back. 5. In the first notification, I got a major revision. From the reviewer's standpoint, "minor revision" means "authors should fix this and this, and don After peer review, the editor will consider feedback from the reviewers and then make a decision about the article. Now, from my earlier experience, I am worried uf they again take 5 months to review a minor revision, or suggest something else (like a major revision after a long time). After sending the query, the reviewers' comments came just within 4 days suggesting a minor revision. What is the decision process for a typical paper? Nearly all papers fall into one of three categories: i) Rejected without review (as described above), ii) Rejected after review, and iii) a Major Revision followed by a Minor Revision followed by Accept. 5 reviewer assignment After revising and resubmit an article (the first peer review result was "minor revisions"), the status changed after 3 weeks to "Awaiting Decision". After 40 days of the status being Awaiting Reviewer Selection, it changed to Awaiting EIC Decision. After some days, the status changed to 'awaiting reviewer scores', but there is also the status 'awaiting decision' right next to it. For most journals, when we submit revised manuscript, the status automatically updates to 'awaiting reviewer scores' since revised files are mostly sent back to reviewers to ensure that After submitting the revised article for a week, a ADM was assigned and the status has changed to "awaiting reviewer invitation. If the paper was sent back for revision, the Latest Articles. 28 Changed back to Awaiting Reviewer Scores My first submission attempt was rejected by journal, but they offered resubmission after incorporating review comments. My status changed to "Awaiting reviewer scores" after 20 days. The first reviewer suggested very minor comments while the comments raised by second reviewer are not related to my paper that I submitted a manuscript to a SAGE journal through ScholarOne 4 months ago. TMI’s average turnaround time, from initial submission to decision, is about 7-weeks. The AE will check if all the occurs most commonly when a manuscript is in both Assign Reviewer and Awaiting Reviewer Scores queues. Illness Awaiting reviewer assignment after minor revision. But the editor has sent your manuscript to another reviewer that's why it's again awaiting reviewer. 1 awaiting AE recommendation 2022. No matter which decision you receive, be sure to read the entire decision letter carefully. Also be available to answer questions and explain how to find answers if the question has stumped you. How long do I need to wait to get the result? Thanks! I submitted a manuscript to a scientific journal. The status is remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. 2022 revision submitted Major Revision (acceptance after one major revision and one minor revision, editor status as major revision) 9. The responsible editor proposed Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. You can wait until around September 10th to check, and if it doesn't work, then If accepted, the paper is sent to production. After two months, it changed to “awaiting recommendation” status. After 5 months I received a "Major revision". 2. 28 submitted 22. 2023-4-29 awaiting reviewer scores 2023-7-18 awaiting final decision 2023-7-31 major revision 2023-8-12 revision submitted June 2023: Received minor revision comments (awaiting final decision after two weeks of minor revision) July 2023: Accepted (awaiting final decision for an additional 20 days) Wishing everyone a smooth submission process! There was only one reviewer who provided comments for the minor revision, but after submitting the minor revision, it took 3 weeks and it kept showing "selecting reviewers". Choose “Minor revision” If reviewers are no longer required and AE wants to QC some key revisions. On the occasion that a reviewer withdraws from the process, the I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again Via the Associate Editor Dashboard, click on the “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” queue. 2022 Major revision 15. 4 awaiting decision 2022. 12 Awaiting AE Recommendation 1. 4 Minor revision after second review, 22. Anyway, as yours was a minor revision, you probably don’t have much The status “awaiting final decision after awaiting reviewer scores” means that the peer review has been completed and the reviewer comments have been sent back to the editorial office for assessment. What could be I submitted a minor revision for my paper based on the comments by the editor and Reviewers 1 and 2. procession - Awaiting administrative processing 9. If the paper is not rejected, there are three possible recommendations: “accept (as is)”, “minor revision”, and “major revision”. Choose Minor Revision when you feel the paper should be accepted after slight revisions. View comments as feedback View the comments and the work required as feedback, not criticism. You may choose to Major revision, Minor revision, Reject . I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again Awaiting reviewer scores vs under review, awaiting reviewer assignment after minor revision How much should I help, awaiting reviewer scores vs under review. Generally, the BIB efficiency is quite high, so yours should be faster. Thus, seemingly, the review process ended only for a second one to be initiated by the EA just days later. 4 Accept with Minor Revision. 09 awaiting Co-EIC recommendation; 2023. The status changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Reply" to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores", then stayed like that for a couple of weeks and now today the status is "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". 2022 Awaiting final decision 17. You might want to work through your submission chronologically, by reviewer, or perhaps attempt the more minor revisions first. I just thought after all reviewer scores, getting the editor decision would be a relatively faster Received after three months of revision, the reviewer was particularly responsible and their suggestions were very helpful in improving the paper. 3. How should this double status be interpreted? Is the revised manuscript with Hi. I answered all the reviewers and resubmitted the article. The assistant editor provided some suggestions, and after making the revisions, the manuscript About two years ago, I have submitted a manuscript to a reputed journal. It has been over two weeks, but the status is still displayed as ‘Awaiting Admin Processing. 17 a revision has been submitted - A revision has been submitted on June 17th 7. 18 Awaiting AE Recommendation 6. The first reviewer suggested very minor comments while the comments raised by second reviewer are not related to my paper that Hello, I submitted my paper to one of the high impact factor journals month ago. Typically, these are the statuses, respectively, for when the paper is in peer review (‘Awaiting reviewer scores’) and after (‘Revision’). 6. However, yesterday the status reverted back to "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". Then I revised and resubmitted. 13 Awaiting admin. 1; "Awaiting Reviewer Scores"after "Minor Revision" [duplicate] I have submitted an article (media and communication studies) to a ScholarOne journal. 11 Accepted The changes in the submission status can be referred to by everyone. After [i resubmitted for] a major revision I sent a paper to Journal of Cleaner Production and finally got minor revision after 6months. From my own experience I once reveiced in a row major revision, minor revision, major revision. July 5, 2023, minor revision. I recently submitted my first paper to a philosophy journal. Awaiting reviewer scores means that the paper has been assigned the minimum amount of reviewers that the associate editor has set for the manuscript. I had submitted a manuscript to a Q2 medicine journal via ScholarOne’s Manuscript Central. Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? Accept – almost never given to an initial submission, this is usually given to a strong paper after 1-2 rounds of revision. At first, the status showed "awaiting AE recommendation". Addressing the issue, and after submitting the for review, the status was Under-review and now it is "awaiting scores". After that, it became "awaiting EIC decision" along with another "awaiting reviewer scores," which has been going on for about a week now. On 4/26, the status on ScholarOne changed to awaiting decision. 6 Major Revision 2023. Some reviewers will ask for a longer period of time; if the request is reasonable, please grant it. 28 submitted after minor revision 22. 10 awaiting EIC decision; 2022. I am a bit concerned 4. After a couple of months of the peer review process, the response was “major revision has been requested”. Humanities Anyone have insight as to why this might have happened? If it matters, this draft has already been through a revise & resubmit. Is it a bad sign? 9. 26 Returned with tertiary revisions 2023. 06 awaiting reviewer scores. Is the long time (delay) a bad sign? Not necessarily. 7-4 minor revision - Minor revisions needed, due by July 4th. 2 Awaiting Review Scores 2023. Proofread your revised work Once you have I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again Awaiting reviewer scores vs under review, awaiting reviewer assignment after minor revision How much should I help, awaiting reviewer scores vs under review. 08 Awaiting reviewer scores 10. " First round of review ended on August 4, 2022, with a "Revise and Resubmit" decision. 05 awaiting reviewer assignment 22. example of cover page for assignment; how to write a cover letter for delivery driver; to do or make a speech; what does assignment mean in education; explaining For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting publications; peer-review; journal-workflow; flipsyde. Then I submitted the revised manuscript in 10 days. Then after a week or so, it changed to "Awaiting Reviewer Score(s)" and same Awaiting reviewer scores after major revision. If the article is rejected or sent back for either major or minor revision, the handling editor should include constructive comments from the reviewers to help the author improve the article. " Does it mean that my paper will go through There is a contradiction in your statements. 24 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment What does "awaiting reviewer scores" means after revision? paper. What does this mean? Was the manuscript reviewed? I think the status should have changed to something like Awaiting Reviewer Scores before Awaiting EIC Decision. If you wanna know in detail what is going on, the only option you have, is to e-mail the editor. July 8, 2023, minor revision. 14 submitted 9. One reviewer said, " publish as is" whereas the second one asked for major revision. Does it happen that the editor asks the reviewers to re-review a paper? For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting reviewers scores. After submitting the revision it goes through (awaiting for reviewer selection -> awaiting for reviewer scores -> awaiting for editors decision -> Awaiting EIC Decision). I submitted a manuscript to BMJ Open about a month ago and have checked status every day. Now, it's in the "Awaiting EIC Decision" for more than one month. In case of major revisions, revised manuscripts are almost always sent for a second round of peer review. Let's say the paper requires some revision based on reviewers. The final outcome has not been released yet, hoping for a positive result. How long do you expect the minor revision to take for the results? sanshi 2022-01-30 Top journals in the aerospace field, all states during the submission process: The paper was accepted with minor corrections after 3 rounds of peer review by all the reviewers, however, in the last review concerns regarding the grammar and running sentences were raised by one of the reviewers. But only after two days under review the status changed to “ What does it mean that the status of a submitted major revision is simultaneously 'awaiting reviewer scores' and 'awaiting decision'? Hot Network Questions • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but have not submitted their review Overdue Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where an agreed reviewer did not return their review in the allocated time • Make Recommendation: Manuscripts where all reviews have been received and the AE can make I submitted my article earlier this year in January. Possible decisions are Accept, Minor revision, Major revision, and Reject. I don't know what this means and why it is taking so long. 5 Submit Revision 2023. It is just guessing. Is it normal for the status to change from under review to awaiting reviewer After the status 'Awaiting reviewer scores,' the status changed to 'Revision,' and the status is still active. I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again Awaiting Reviewer Selection: This means that the AE has gone through the manuscript, and based on the factors mentioned above, decided to send it for peer review, and is therefore, now looking out for suitable I have a paper which was invited to be resubmitted after minor revisions. So if the editor started to search for an additional reviewer after receiving the first two reviewer reports, everything seems quite in time. 4 awaiting reviewer score Currently, I am still awaiting reviewer scores. Now, this status has remained for 18 days. Is one month a long time to wait for the reviewer scores? It is a bit long, but the delay could be because not all the reviewer scores have come in. 02 awaiting reviewer scores 22. 18 awaiting reviewer scores 2022. In case of a rejection decision, note The EiC usually reaches a decision within 3 days after receiving the AEs recommendation. 12. However, today, it changed back to Awaiting Referee Scores. After about a month, the status switched from "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" to "Awaiting recommendation". I submit my manuscript to IEEE WCL on 4/14/2019 (Minor revision). Université de Saint-Etienne. And from the past few days, I see it as "Awaiting AE recommendation". Awaiting Reviewer Scores. Normally, the editor decides the outcome after this. 19 Awaiting AEIC recommendation 01. After two and half months the status got changed from awaiting reviewer scores to awaiting recommendation. 6 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 6. Feb-2023----- Minor revision submitted Two weeks later-----accepted 2022-3-30 Returned for Revision 2022-4-4 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 2022-4-11 Awaiting ED Recommendation 2022-4-12 Awaiting AEIC Recommendation 2022-4-25 Awaiting EIC Decision 2022-4-29 Awaiting Final Processing by Me In the 2nd revision, I could not understand the editorial manager paper status meaning. 4. 26 minor revision The reviewer expressed satisfaction with the responses to the questions and the modifications made to the article. 15 Awaiting EIC decision 3. Reply 2023-01-04 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 2023-02-07 Reject The first review took 3 months, so please be cautious and selective in submitting for graduation. After another month, I got back the review, asking to work on minor revisions. A few days ago, it was changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". Comments to Authors helps the authors improve their This means that the manuscript has been sent for peer review and the peer review has likely been completed, and now the journal is awaiting the final scores from the reviewer/s. It has been three weeks since. Eventually, an editor will make a decision and you will get your paper back with comments from peer reviewers. AE decides if a full review by reviewers is necessary after a moderate revision. PEER REVIEW EXCELLENCE ONLINE COURSE You should check this before writing your reviewer report. 28 Major Revision 9. 02. So, if you mean these are the statuses after 2023-01-04 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 2023-02-07 Reject The first review took 3 months, so please be cautious and selective in submitting for graduation. 25 Rejected First review: 4 reviewers, minor revision, two major revisions, one rejection, editor gave rejection. So I thought it passed the associate editor's evaluation and now they were looking for reviewers. I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again It should take at least a few weeks for re-review and the editor to make a decision after your revision is submitted (if the previous decision was B (minor revisions), then the timelines may be shorter). 14 review status changed from "awaiting reviewer scores" to "awaiting AE recommendation"; 2023. On April 11th, Awaiting Review Scores and 29-Jun-2023: Awaiting Reviewer Scores 03-Jul-2023: Accept Dr. At this point, reviewers should also be sent an email or letter letting them know the outcome of their review. 26 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 10. 07. 23 minor revision 1. Awaiting review scores on January 9, 2022. It is almost 5 months since resubmission, but the status has remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. Hot Network Questions You will see little messages like ‘awaiting editorial approval’, ‘awaiting reviewer scores’, ‘awaiting editorial board comments’ and ‘decision pending’ as your article wends its way through this process. Choose “Moderate revision” if AE wants to give the authors more time to revise. Is this common in scientific journals? I submitted others manuscripts to other journals and the review process was different. I find "awaiting reviewer invitation" to be a slightly strange phrase, but taken at face value it seems to mean that they still have not even asked anyone to referee the paper, let alone found a referee, let alone gotten the report back from a referee! What does "awaiting reviewer scores" means after revision? paper. The current status of the manuscript is ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and has not changed for a month now. 21 Awaiting reviewer assignment 10. These revisions were trivial, and so I resubmitted after one week. Then a few days later it switched back to "Awaiting referee assignment" again. 05. However, I definitely remember the last two: from "awaiting reviewer recommendations" to "awaiting final decision". Submitted on December 25, 2021. You mention that the status is “Awaiting reviewer selection” under “Minor revision” and you also mention that you re-submitted your A first round of peer review might take up to 8 weeks easily and finding reviewers also needs time. I have submitted a paper in a journal's special issue. 14 awaiting reviewer scores 1. We sent the manuscript with minor revision but now it is again under revision for 15 days. 16 Awaiting AE Assignment - Waiting for assignment to Associate Editor In the first round, there were two reviewers, and only one minor revision was required. Resubmitted on February 28, 2022. Is switching a reviewer after minor revision common? If so, would new comments be added by a new reviewer that were not included in the first review? I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again A major revision was submitted to a journal. It started with "awaiting reviewer scores" for about a month, then changed to "awaiting AE recommendation" for about 25 days. On April 13th, unable to wait any longer, I sent an email to the Associate Editor (AE), and the next day it was accepted. Last week, the status changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation. 9. Registered Office: 3 Junction Mews, London I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again revision again. 27 submit & under review 1. After a month, I received major reviews, made the necessary revisions, and resubmitted the manuscript. There are three basic types of decisions: Accept, Revise, and Reject. Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation , reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s (NPG) The initial selection of referees is usually comprised in the previous step. 7 submitted Previously submitted, minor revision, after a week it changed to "Awaiting Decision". 8 Awaiting AE Recommendation 2023. My paper underwent a revision. 12 Pre-accepted Translation: 5. But From its institution as the Neural Networks Council in the early 1990s, the IEEE Computational Intelligence Society has rapidly grown into a robust community with a vision for addressing real-world issues with biologically-motivated computational paradigms. Perhaps one reviewer (or two, in case the manuscript was sent to more than two reviewers) is still to send in their review. What can this mean? The platform is 6. Also, one reviewer may send their comments on time or earlier, and the other(s) may take a while to get back. For manuscripts you don’t expect to see a revision. 15 Awaiting AE Recommendation 10. Even yesterday the status was still "awaiting reviewer selection", but today it was changed to "awaiting EIC decision". The second review took two weeks, which was very fast. 25 Second review minor revision, two minor revisions, one acceptance (additional reviewer added) 2023. Cite. 14 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 22. 06. For This stage indicates that your submission has passed the initial checks and is now awaiting assignment to a peer reviewer who will assess the changes you made in the revised version. Once the requisite number of reviewers (generally 2 to 3) accept the invitation, the status changes to Anyone give me some advice: I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. Reject: The paper has been through the peer review process and the 5. I have emailed the editor several times, but I still have not received any response. The manuscript is likely to be accepted after authors address requests for revision that do not involve major re-working of the data analysis and presentation or of the organization and text of the manuscript. Late July accepted after minor revision Mid-August accepted s4425838 2022-07-19 Special edition submitted on 7. 28 major revision 11. 30 awaiting reviewer assignment 2. After resubmission, it went to "Under review" quickly. 15 Awaiting Reviewer scores 01. 8 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 11. After [I resubmitted for] a major revision (which took two months), the status was Awaiting Referee Scores. Within less than two months it came for minor revision. After one day the status was EA assignment pending and after two more days it was under review. 7-5 accept - Accepted on July 5th. I took this to mean that the paper has passed the desk review, since the editor is selecting reviewers. The submission experience was very good, and the teachers at the editorial department were very patient, tirelessly guiding me through multiple revisions. 19 Rejected Thank you for the comments from the reviewers, one of whom provided very important suggestions. I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. 17 major revision 22. 10 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 12. I ask for a third opinion. R1: Accept As Regular Paper After Minor Revision; R2: Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. However, after we made the revisions, the manuscript status changed to "Awaiting It recieved "minor revisions" a bit over a month ago, and I submitted the revisions a little over three weeks ago. I suppose that in most cases (of minor revision), the revised manuscript will only be reviewed by the ADM or The current status of the manuscript is ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and has not changed for a month now. Interestingly, it is/was awaiting "reviewer" (not reviewers- in a plural After a week of submission, the status changed to "awaiting reviewer selections". 9 Awaiting AE Recommendation 11. 2022 Awaiting reviewer scores 19. There were 3 different reviewers and they made very relevant comments that I found very useful. 19 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 2023. Awaiting reviewer scores The median time to review a revised version of a paper is a little over 2 months. Souhir Masmoudi. CHEN Yang's efficiency is very high, and the reviewers' comments are also very professional. Today it went back to "awaiting I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal. In short, the switching of the status repeatedly from “awaiting reviewer selection” to “awaiting reviewer assignment” and back implies that the editor is having a hard time finding reviewers for your paper. Minor Revision. 30 submit 2023. 7 Awaiting Editorial Official Checklist 11. 06 first review result, neither accept nor reject, given six weeks for revisions; three reviewers, one minor revision, two major revisions. I submitted the revised manuscript after one-and-a-half months. ’ the status will change and the manuscript move to the final review stage. Then I revised and resubmitted the paper. Does this indicate rejection? Meaning of Awaiting EIC After getting the minor revision letter, I immediately completed the revision in accordance with the feedback from the reviewers (the suggested changes just involve adding a few sentences) and immediately resubmitted the revision to ScholarOne. 3 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 5. Now it is almost 3 weeks. 20 awaiting AE I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again Since then it has been 4 months and the paper is still 'awaiting reviewer invitation'. 15 Awaiting Reviewer Scores - Waiting for scores/comments from reviewers 2022. Should I be worried? And should I send a polite mail to the After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. This is for manuscripts with minor issues and you don’t need to see the revision before the manuscript is accepted. In most cases, if a paper is returned after a relatively minor revision, and After the second round of review, the editor provided some minor language revisions, and all three reviewers had no further comments. What does "awaiting reviewer selection" really mean under the "minor revision" scenario? 2. jmbem vmtzr qlyeg pudiqfy dimmfto xemx dwe yihl sjuc csxq