Vuescan vs silverfast reddit. Vuescan vs Nikon Scan .
Vuescan vs silverfast reddit As for compatibility with Mac OS: the Epson will come with a key for Silverfast that is compatible, for the Plustek I believe you will need to buy a Vuescan license to get it running on the latest version of the OS, adding an extra 100$ to the cost of the scanner. Previously I've used the 16 bit scan function just in an attempt to get as much out of the film as possible. My current scanning setup consists on a Minolta ScanDual III with VueScan and an EPSON V550 with Silverfast. Vuescan is cheaper and has some demo (and hacked version, if you’re interested in stealing or extended testing). I also upgraded to get A personal comparison of two scanning software for negatives, with different settings, times and results. Hi, I have a Plustek Opticfilm 8100. Vuescan had (has?) many built-in film profiles but I didn't find them useful. These are scans from an Epson V550 + the Silverfast Portra 400 preset. i find that a the flatbed handles that better because of the negative holder and weight of the VueScan is described as 'Third-party software for film scanners and flatbed scanners' and is a Image Scanner in the system & hardware category. What I truly enjoy is the film profiles (NegaFix) in Silverfast which saves me a loooot of time. However, Vuescan gave me a bunch of problems when updated to the newest version; very frustrating. Then we will see how each program compares when looking at VueScan vs SilverFast. They were tested on an Epson V700 and/or Plustek 120 scanner. I would pick vuescan anyday over silverfast. I tried out silverfast and I found that the quality of the raw This is my first time using Silverfast after using Vuescan for a good while. Here, you can change the document type, image type, and specify the resolution for the scan. . I'm wondering if Silverfast would be better, or easier to work with. I use Vuescan with my V550. But ya already own vuescan, if nlp was standalone or could somehow integrate into vuescan I'd buy it for sure. Like you indicated, it is possible that some slides, particulary ones with more shadows, may benefit using Silverfast. I find the interface a little more pleasant than VueScan, but I can’t figure out how to get DNGs when I batch scan. European Robin. One of my tests was to scan a high contrast image in both depths and drag the highlight/shadow sliders to the maximum on both, and then do a “difference” layer to see where the 48-bit image was supposedly superior. 1. First person experiences only please refrain from using third party reference material you found on the web. I also use Auto-IT8 color profiling in Silverfast as the scanner included an IT8 target. New Topics. You can use Silverfast's own NegaFix but the film profiles are limited. Vuescan's user interface is complicated enough. I have not been able to work the Nikon software and scan film. Bits per pixel: 24-bit RGB TIFF file type: 24-bit RGB VueScan vs SilverFast. Internet Culture (Viral) and they recommend Vuescan. I was surprised by the value The funny thing is I'm experiencing this for Silverfast AND vuescan but not for Epson Scan. If they're negatives, that will also do a very good job, but you'll get even better results with negatives using a dedicated film scanner – I'd recommend the Plustek Optifilm 8200i. gg/pendemic Members Online. Basically eliminates the need to adjust colors to match the scan to the slide bc the software does it automatically for you. 🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽 Archived post. This is because VueScan gives colder results. You can do it, a fair bit in silverfast, but its just a bit awkward IMO. And later use Silverfast HDR to convert. Silverfast is expensive, bloated, but IMO easier to use. I use Silverfast. r/Darkroom is Reddit's best place for discussions on film developing, printing, toning and hand-coloring prints, darkroom techniques, equipment and For software, I've heard nothing but bad things about Silverfast in terms of learning curve, and everyone seems to like Vuescan instead. When I do a single frame, it will save as a DNG. I have vuescan scans of images in tiff files for various scanners in I tried googling but there's not much meaningful info about the upgrade. Especially given the random limits they put on the cheaper versions, like being limited to 8bit per channel, which is pretty annoying as someone who shoots BW, and the exorbitant prices charged for a single license, applying to one device, vs the fully featured Vuescan which works with multiple devices on a single license. It is slower than EpsonScan but I love the multiple exposure Silverfast 8 to Silverfast 9 Scanning Bought a second hand plustek 8200i that came with Sf8. So, can I use SilverFast or VueScan with the Epson FastFoto (FF-680W) scanner? The unofficial but officially recognized Reddit community discussing the latest LinusTechTips NLP is better 99% of the time, than Vuescan, Silverfast etc. Vuescan as it Thing is, the processing time for Silverfast is around 28 seconds per slide. Silverfast I have with the Heidelberg Saphir HiRes - it works great with Silverfast, but Vuescan fails to calibrate right after a while. Metrix X: I like to hear from actual users as why and how they use the two scanning software package. Sometimes (almost always in the past) these two proesses (scan and inversion) are done in the same software (EpsonScan, SilverFast, Vuescan etc). There's also darktable as a free alternative to NLP. No problem they deleted previous owner license and gave me a bright new one license with a new S/N. But like I said earlier, in practice it’s a different story. I find it a lot easier to do adjustments, contrast, colour, levels etc, in another application. The best VueScan alternative is NAPS2, which is both free and Open Source. SilverFast is produced by LaserSoft Imaging software that comes from Germany. Which means that for two perfectly exposed frames you're already losing a bit of flexibility with film. If you already use Lightroom, the Vuescan -> Lightroom workflow is pretty The difference between the 8200i SE vs 8200i Ai is software and bundled accessories. I am having issues with silverfast making all of my slides look extremely blue that are impossible to fix with its automatic features. I also chose SF because I noticed after a lot of reading that the conclusions it's users came to in comparison to VS is that it produces slightly bolder or sharper colors, whereas VS RAWs appear to be slightly more washed out, On the other hand, Silverfast offers many more options and tools which, as a result, gives the end user greater control over the scan it outputs. Wonder if VueScan's DNGs are also uncompressed or if they're smarter about it. It took quite some time to get to a conclusion, but you can see every setting that I made in Silverfast and Vuescan to really understand the comparison. Both scans passed through Negative Lab Pro with the same settings applied. If the previous owner has the Silverfast software, it's going to be ancient. EPSON Scan has a Home mode which is comparable to VueScan’s Standard mode. Also I don't need vuescan, because the free Silverfast Se is already doing the job. Or check it out in the app stores I have the free copy of Silverfast, but found Epson Scan to be easier. VueScan is $120 bux but works on Mac/Windows/Linux Silverfast is $50 but only for Windows/Mac I have to use the firewire port on my v709 and am forced to use a Windows 7 laptop with that port. I have tried restarting, updating software, updating scanner drivers and all kinds of other stuff but no luck. I think one of these saves as DNG format, which they claim is better somehow. People share experience of working with v9 but it really seems like my usual workflow will stay the same and won't improve much. Here is a comparison of ICE on the Coolscan 5000 using Vuescan and Nikonscan. Silverfast had a profile for the film – the AGFA HDC 200 – but Vuescan didn’t here I used a AGFA XRG/XRS 200 profile. It took a bit of time and checking to make sure it was the software causing the issue and not my scanner. Again, the real time view of changes in Silverfast is a very attractive feature, but it may be a mute point if Vuescan's ease of use and generation of quality scans surpasses Silverfast. I do most of the white-balancing, contrast, saturation, cropping and Silverfast seems more geared to users with a structured workflow. Does anyone have any thoughts/comparisons on using Epson Scan, Silverfast, Vuescan, and Negative Lab Pro? I’ve started testing Epson Scan 1 Negative, 1 scanner, 1 computer and 2 software packages! This is my in detail comparison between Silverfast and Vuescan, both the most current versions, re Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. Background: I've been pretty satisfied with Vuescan the last few years. Other than that I personally see no use for Silverfast since ,as you mentioned,it is much slower and most of the color correction can be also done in the Epson software very easily and adjusted further in Lightroom. I also upgraded to get the multi-exposure feature. Vuescan V Silverfast I'm sure this has been asked before but I'm now to this page so if there's somewhere better to go, please direct me to it! I've just bought a Plustek 7200 and am looking to get software to let me use it on windows 10. For both scanners, I have conducted a total of 4 open-lid test scans in a dark room in both SF and VS Pro software. I also own VueScan. How do people like Vuescan with the OpticFilm 7300? Is anyone using an emulator? And if so, what I own several copies of Silverfast in equal number of incarnations as scanners were supplied with them. About the 7000 vs 8000 series I believe they share internal components with minor differences. I think the Ai is worth the upgrade due to the IT8 target and a version of SilverFast that's not completely gimped but that's up to you. Latest I recently updated vuescan (windows 10) and it's maddeningly confusing. x to HDR studio ( Reddit iOS Reddit Android Reddit Premium About Reddit Advertise Blog Careers Press. See how Vuescan and Silverfast perform with infrared, film profiles and NLP conversions. It's generally been working out really well for me. I read that scanning software like SilverFast and VueScan is better than Epson's software. They just updated it to work with Silverfast RAW DNG files. Probably worth scanning 64-bit RGBI raw then outputting the IR cleaned DNG from that after, if you can't just output both at the same time The only useful thing in Silverfast is "Negafix" which can be useful to correct negatives in a more automatic manner. Yea, the muti-exposure feature now in Silverfast really interested me if it could increase the dynamic range of my These are side by side results of a scan done with Epson's Scan 2 software vs. I have a Plustek 7200i film scanner, so I am just learning to use Silverfast SE. Or check it out in the app stores i did not spend hours finetuning vuescan, given how its paid software i decided that it would only be worht the money if it was better in every single way and having to fck with it to make it as good as the free option just feels wrong to Did that, I tried all the raw fie types and it didn't work, when I selected scan image instead of color negative film, it would give me a negative image with the cleaning, but the overall sharpness went down it seems. Let’s dive into a range of different aspects. Silverfast's is over the top. Any opinions on a Silverfast 8 bit scan VS an Epson Scan 16 bit scan? I have a V550 and got my free copy of silverfast earlier this year, and am trying tk decide what workflow to use. As someone who doesn't have much experience with editing software, inverting with dedicated software is Reddit's most popular camera brand-specific subreddit! We are an unofficial community of users of the Sony Alpha brand and related gear: Sony E Mount, Sony A Mount, legacy Minolta cameras, RX cameras, lenses, flashes, photoshare, and discussion. This means you can't use EPSON's generic profile or SilverFast's generic profile, so you'll get scans equivalent to what you get in EPSON Scan in its "No Color Management" mode. Their multi-sampling version (SilverFast SE Plus, SilverFast Ai and SilverFast Ai Studio version 6. also, DSLR scanning gets annoying when negatives are curled. Both should produce equally good scans. Or check it out in the app stores I use Silverfast on my Opticfilm 8100 dedicated scanner. I see a place for both being honest, though if I had nothing. In addition if Silverfast is bought bundled with a A discussion thread on film scanning software, where users compare SilverFast and VueScan features, pros and cons. Maybe those numbers I just pulled out of my ass, but it's around those VueScan is more expensive compared to the cheapest edition of Silverfast but it comes fully featured at just $90 and is licensed very fairly. Outside of an emulator, I only see Vuescan as an option, as it looks like SilverFast requires a working driver in order to operate the scanner. Or check it out in the app stores when using vuescan, had problems with lines and registration errors. Right off the bat, we have a Europe vs US comparison. You would only use it if you were DSLR scanning. Pentaxian. It scans at around 50 seconds per slide. Performing scans on the latter software, Vuescan, works just fine and there are no green lines so this leads me to believe that this issue is intrinsic to the Silverfast software and I'm processing my own b&w again, and I want to scan the negatives. Silverfast (maybe vuescan too) has a feature that allows you to do an IT8 calibration for your specific scanner. Just Google "Epson scanner and Silverfast download" Reply reply More replies More replies. I plan to do most of my editing in Capture One, but would love some advice on the best scanning program! I chose SilverFast over Vuescan initially as the former is used in archival institutions such as LoC, NARA, and other professional, archival scanning workflows. Output parameters: -Max Scan Area If supported by your scanner hardware, both SilverFast and VueScan can scan your film multiple times with different exposure levels, in something akin to HDR photography, allowing for a single output image with greater dynamic range. I stop using the Epson software a while ago, so it might not be as precise a judgment as Vuescan and Silverfast, because it’s made from my memories of the software. I guess to draw a crude analogy, it’s sort of like JPEG vs RAW in digital photography. Silver fast because it’s free for the v600. Vuescan isnt an exact replacement but a single license works with hundreds of scanners. Vuescan vs EPSON Scan. I also scanned the same frame with the various modifiers in Vuescan as compared to one neutral setting in Nikonscan. See opinions, questions and tips from film photographers Just curious as to some users experience with Vuescan and Silverfast. The I just got my hands on an epson v700 and want to start developing and scanning my own film. I haven't used Silverfast, but a lot of people like vuescan better. I have always tried to use curves and such before scanning and VueScan doesn't seem to hav What would you need Negative Lab Pro for, if you use Silverfast/Vuescan? NLP is a Lightroom plugin for negative conversion - Silverfast/Vuescan already does this for you. Epson admits as much by bundling it. This is my in detail comparison between Silverfast and Vuescan, both the most current versions, recorded on may 28th '23. SilverFast? VueScan? It's time to unravel the mystery and find the perfect scanning software to unlock the full potential of your precious photographsIn this Currently using a plustek 7600i with silverfast and it sucks that silverfast only supports 24bit tiff scans with its isrd VueScan's IR dust removal can be nice but I wouldn't use it in the main file. Terms & Policies Vuescan vs Nikon Scan . Or check it out in the app stores TOPICS. This ensurses that your slide film colors are accurate straight from the scan. Here’s a quick comparison of what I think is good and bad about the Vuescan, Epson and Silverfast scanner software. Join Date: Jan 2010 My biggest concern is with VueScan & Silverfast and their compatibility with the new mac processors and OS. Might get an opportunity to get a Coolscan 5000 in good condition. As a non Adobe user, it Looks like a logical option if I just want to quickly Scan my negative as a DNG. I'm hoping this will help people new to scanner software make an informed choice. 6. However the colors on vuescan using the same scanner produces colors that almost exactly resemble the I know the primefilm XAs works well with silverfast, and I was wondering if the new updated version (XA Plus) would also work somehow? Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. I'm using an only M Vuescan vs silverfast upvotes Please join our discord server while we are shut down in protest of the recent Reddit API changes: https://discord. e. It is intended to serve as a deep-dive, an informative, detailed-rich post for anyone now or in the future who uses LSI's SilverFast Ai Studio 9 and SilverFast HDR Studio 9 Scanning Software, also known as their Archive Suite. If you’re still using the epsonscan utility, ditch it for Silverfast or vuescan. Usually film has to be 1-2mm above the scanner glass, so maybe that’s the issue. I also purchased a brand new v850 last week - nothing's been on the glass yet. So far, I’ve been having a blast going through my negative archives and scanning in color to practice color correction and what not Vuescan and Silverfast are the best programs out there. Vuescan is not really meant for major adjustments, its got the basic stuff covered. Both are a lot faster than the old original Nikon software. Therefore, I'm tempted to just buy the cheaper 8200SE and then buy VueScan along with it. The epsonscan software is garbage and the results I’ve been getting out of Silverfast have been so much better Edit: here’s some of the results I’m getting with Silverfast and an aging v550. Silverfast is fine for a bundled program but it runs poorly on windows. TDLR - Have an Epson 10000XL that has a brand new glass on it directly from Epson. Reply reply [deleted] • Anyone here familiar with the Silverfast software? Asking for tips/pointers to scan efficiently and to get the highest quality out of it. I haven't tried Viewscan yet, but did try SilverFast, and have to say I wasn't that impressed with it. as far as flatbed scanners go, its super easy, quick, and the UI is quite friendly (unlike vuescan). If anyone is running a similar setup, it’d be great to know your experiences. I have an older version of VueScan, but it seems to me to be very slow at scanning, and a lot of the controls are not the most intuitive. If you’re scanning family images, you don’t want them to look like cold documents. It blows my mind how different the two passes turned out. SilverFast 8. Just trying to scan 35mm negs. Cost $ but it’s great and works with just about any scanner Epson Scan does a better job with pre-sharpening though if you use it. This subreddit has gone Restricted and reference-only as part of a mass protest i forgot to answer your question haha - i really like the batch scanning in silverfast. They do have the Portras, and a lot of Ilford films, most of the Fuji as well. If you take the time to learn how to use Silverfast, you would likely be happier with the resultant images. Just curious as to some users experience with Vuescan and Silverfast. Something is up with your scanning methodology or Vuescan. To get the most from Silverfast, one usually needs to go all-out with I got a Primefilm XAs recently, and it came with SilverFast 9, so I’ve been trying it out. Each copy will be tied only to a certain scanner and person; will only work with a particular version of the operating system (i. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. Some questions I have: I have exactly the same scanner. The previous 600 DPI was causing some interloping and a Reddit user suggested to move to 800 DPI for the V600. The software is not by a long shot the best scanner client and the guy that owns LaserSoft is greedy, to say the least. The default Epson Scan software that can be downloaded from the Epson site will allow it to work on W10 as well. I use Vuescan and it's pretty straightforward, haven't tried Silverfast so I can't say. I purchased the Pro edition of Vuescan some months ago. Vuescan vs Silverfast. Mix of slide and color negative. Easier to use, nicer results, and it costs a whole lot less. Silverfast 5 Ai ceased working on Basic setup summary in VueScan: Scan resolution: 800 DPI for most prints and 1600 DPI when either the height or width is < 2400 pixels. In either case, you'll want to use the Silverfast software since it's loaded with options to get the best images (though takes a bit to learn the ropes). I understand that Silverfast offers better editing capabilities, but between Vuescan and Silverfast, which provides a better first scan results? 11-01-2020, 03:27 AM #2: pid. Vuescan or Silverfast is not necessary. Vuescan I use with my PIE Primefilm 3650Pro3 - works great with Vuescan, but usability with Silverfast is horrible and it always screwed up batch scanning. Maybe try using kit holder instead of ANR glass. The Silverfast demo won't run for me 🤷♂️. Such a missed opportunity for SilverFast, as their color science is great, and wide scanner driver library give them a great leg up, maybe not over competitors like VueScan and NLP but definitely over Epson Scan and the like. But because Personally I think vuescan is a more powerful and configurable software if you want raw files to edit in Lightroom/photoshop. Especially because it has some proprietary format nonsense going on. Whereas VueScan is a Hamrick software, a US-based company. I'd be upset if I paid specifically for it. I have been playing with Silverfast HDR. I will start: Before I use epson scan and it was OKAY for 35mm even decent for I agree that silverfast is pretty sucky. By popular demand, this is a comparison of how Vuescan differs from Silverfast's AI/HDR Suite for the Real Raw Scanning process. To be honest, for me. Plus, I like the batch scanning in Vuescan better. In this example, I used Kodak 160VC which Vuescan had a profile for. Sometimes (increasingly these days, it appears) people want to "scan" as one process (eg with Vuescan etc, or certainly with a digital camera) and do the inversion in separate software. It's very cumbersome, I didn't think their solution to Digital ICE works nearly as good (they didn't want to What are the Main Differences Between Silverfast Scanning Suite vs Silverfast HDR? Other than one can scan and other can't? Also, Can I use Silverfast HDR for vuescan DNGs? Or DSLR scans? I really appreciate your insights. It's nice to feel validated in I have been using Silverfast software for a while, and highly recommend investing in Negative Lab Pro plugin for Lightroom. I just want some opinions from users of Silverfast. Because of this I've gone back to using cyberviewthe software that comes with peimefilm scanners. It's more involved, slower to use, but fits the single image work I do on the 8100. If you plan to use VueScan be sure to get an IT8 target for profiling because VueScan unfortunately doesn't support using external profiles. But silverfast seems to have better color correction if you want a I'm considering the hitherto unthinkable: switching from Vuescan to Silverfast. Both Silverfast SE ($50) and VueScan Pro Vuescan is very easy to use, silverscan has a strong learning curve. Additionally, VueScan can repeatedly scan images up to 16 times without varying the exposure to reduce readout Silverfast is very comprehensive, but I just prefer vuescan. Right, in theory 48 bit scans have more latitude for adjustments. Naturist02 • Use Vuescan. How well does Vuescan dust and scratch function work? Any detail loss? SilverFast can be quite expensive depending on the version you purchase where the Epson Scan software is free. But one scenario in Nikon Scan vs VueScan vs Silverfast Scanning Back in 2007, when I first got into digital photography, i decided to get a scanner to scan my old film negatives (and also so my dad could scan his large collection of slides) Having used Silverfast inversion, and Vuescan inversion, and lightroom manual editing, I've now settled on Vuescan RAW scans + NLP as the quickest and most effective way to get what I want from my images. NegaFix works a lot better for me than ColorPerfect in Photoshop. SF = SilverFast, VS = VueScan Pro. The resolution is fine, but it isn’t focused. at converting negatives to accurate colors (of the film used, at the very least) - so if you just scan the negatives without color converting in Silverfast (or without silverfast at all), and use NLP to convert, you get the best results, is my experience. Silverfast, Film profile used; Vuescan, Film profile used; Silverfast is actually doing a pretty good job, with its film profile – at least with the AGFA HDC 200 film – it’s a little dark and a bit to magenta for my Or, some simply gave up and switched to VueScan or another scanning software such as EpsonScan. In the end, my preference is Silverfast, alltough not by much. And Silverfast 9SE came free with it. <br> I have heard different things about VueScan and Silverfast. My personal choice in the SilverFast vs Epson Scan debate is that I would (and have) purchased Since SilverFast is already included in the price of the scanner, I don't want to pay extra for VueScan or Negative Lab Pro Why use positive film type settings on a color negative film For some reason, if I use Silverfast with Negafix, the scans have a very purple tint, that I cannot easily remove via post-processing. ) claims to tease more details than vuescan. I actually prefer the way Silverfast works. First Flex Nib Pen upvotes <p>I have a MacBook Pro with Leopard and a Nikon 4000 film scanner. 14-15 stops vs 12-14 stops, and that's for high end films. There are more than 25 alternatives to VueScan for a variety of platforms, including Windows, Linux, Mac, Flathub and GNOME apps. Looking at VueScan vs SilverFast, I prefer the results from SilverFast. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast I use Vuescan, Silverfast and LinoColor Color Factory, all on the same scanner, a Lino Opal Ultra Flatbed, and use VueScan for all my other scanners (a Polaroid SprintScan 4000, Umax Powerlook III, Epson Expression 1600, as well as a few others) Facebook Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email Share Link. And now you have to take into account the scanner, most of them aren Just got an Epson V800 and am deciding between which program to use to scan. Whereas if we talk about Silverfast then it offers different type of package such as for SilverFast HDR to HDR studio upgrade, you have to pay $199, for SilverFast HDR to HDR studio Photoproof pay $679, for SilverFast Ai 6. There are Image Unlike Vuescan or Nikonscan, the Silverfast license is for one computer/scanner: if anything significant changes in your setup, the software becomes a pricey brick. vbtokpvlztmwjnshfyovkbcwzfkmxwvqrragpcgqygikyiqyhdtqxpg