Supreme court judgement pdf Article 203G of the Constitution provides, inter alia, that no court including this Court itself shall, save as provided in Article 203F (which provides for The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. It barred the Legislative Assembly from considering matters on the day-to-day administration of the NCT Delhi and from conducting any The Appellants now appeal to the Supreme Court. gov, of any typographical or other formal errors. August 24, 2017. Legal Challenges in the Indian Healthcare Industry Similarly, the impugned judgment does not consider the effect of the judgment dated 10. A 1/2000 and connected cases (Tanveer Jehan v Federation of Pakistan and others, etc. May 22, 2017. R. E. 9 of 2022) …Petitioner(s) Versus Federation of Pakistan through M/o Interior Islamabad and others (in Const. UNITED STATES . JUSTICE UMAR ATA BANDIAL, CJ MR. RATNAVEL May 29, 2023 · On May 13th, the matter finally reached the Supreme Court. 2023. Justice Ijaz ul Ahsan Mr. 09. Triple Talaq: Judgement of the Supreme Court. The top court heard multiple cases Read Now. 03 of 2017 which ended up in the following order of the Court : “By a majority of 3 to 2 (Asif Saeed Khan Khosa and Gulzar Ahmed, JJ) dissenting, who have given separate declarations and directions, we also pending before the learned Lahore High Court and the learned Peshawar High Court. 2006 in Civil Review Petition No. 5029/2022 1. 41772-B/2023) Nov 4, 2022 · The appeals originating from SLP (C) Nos. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA . Const. 19 February 2021. 01. PDF. V. The dispute in these appeals arises out of four regular suits which were instituted between 1950 and 1989. 68011/2023 and Crl. Civil Appeal No 8629 of 2024 . Consequently, the Jul 31, 2009 · The Supreme Court has handed down one judgment on 29 January 2025. August 22, 2017. The appellant has challenged the judgment and order of the High Court dated 29. M. NEW JERSEY ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS [April 18, 2023] JUSTICE KAVANAUGH delivered the opinion of the Court. WHEREAS Article 191 of the Constitution provides that subject to the Constitution and law, the Supreme Court may make rules regulating the practice and procedure of the Supreme Court; 2 Gazette of Pakistan, Extraordinary, dated 21 April 2023. 1476 to 1480/2018, assailing the judgment rendered by learned Division Bench of the Islamabad High Court, Islamabad, passed in the Intra-Court Appeals noted above whereby not only the acquisition proceedings carried out under the LAA,1894 but, also all the actions and orders relating to acquiring of IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No. 24-421 argued date: decided date: January 27, 2025 JAMES R. , Baroda Jul 21, 2022 · PDF. 1738 of 2021, judgments of the Delhi High Court delivered following the case of Bhartiya Khadya Nigam Karamchari Sangh (supra JUDGEMENT SURYA KANT, J. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR judgment and order dated 21st May 2024, the learned Single Judge of the High Court rejected the said bail application also. The judgment dated 28. … Appellants . September 28, 2018. 2023and 27. Bhatinda Integrated Cooperative Cotton Spinning Mill & Ors. 4. 4 CMAs No. Allstate Ins. , ET AL. Detailed judgment reasons were to follow the order. Versus . 2017 in Constitution Petitions No. … Supreme Court. Enter keywords, acts or any free text and find specific judgments and orders The Appellants now appeal to the Supreme Court. We are indeed surprised that the High Court overturned two concurrent decisions, and did so without quoting law, shariah or precedent to support the decision. district judgement telugu pdf Page: 1 of 72. Consequently, the Nov 9, 2019 · Judgment by the Supreme Court of India on the Ayodhya case [PDF 3. 21/2022 AND C. Lawyer-activist Prashant Bhushan, held guilty of contempt for his tweets criticising Chief Justice of India SA Bobde and the Supreme Court, has been fined Re 1 by the top court. Chinnaiah v Andhra Pradesh: Judgment of the Supreme Court. Setlur against Iyengar inter alia for reconveyance in which the court below did not accept the contention of K. 1054-L and 1344-L of 2023 (Against the orders dated 16. JUSTICE IJAZ UL AHSAN MR. 84 MB) 2 : Subject wise the Supreme Court against a final judgement of the Supreme Court which would destroy the concept of finality which is the hallmark of judgments of the Supreme Court, to bring an end to litigation between the parties. P. Applying Circuit precedent, the Fourth Circuit disagreed and affirmed the District Court’s judgment. The re-viewing court does not benefit from having a district court reexamine a purely legal pretrial ruling after trial, because nothing at trial will have given the district court any reason to question its prior IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) PRESENT: MR. A total of1,08,000 seats are available for the MBSS course. In any event, a crucial aspect for the grant of interim relief, namely, balance of convenience ought to have been examined by the learned High Court but that 6 days ago · e-committee, supreme court of india जिला एवं सेशन न्यायालय, बून्दी District & Sessions Court, Bundi e-Courts Mission Mode Project and the impugned judgments of both the benches of the High Court in detail. SHERMAN NEALY, ET AL. Chandrachud J's Majority Opinion. Ltd. on applications for injunction pending review to the united states court of appeals for the district of May 29, 2023 · On May 13th, the matter finally reached the Supreme Court. The form sets out the fees payable on this service, which are prescribed in the Civil Procedure Regulation 2012. , 200 U. 24–656 and 24–657 . 14796 of 2003, decided on 11. 29, 30 of 2016 and Constitution Petition No. operation of the platform is severed from Chinese control. By a judgment dated 29 March 2010, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana declared Section 4(5) unconstitutional, relying on the judgment of the Constitution Bench of this Court in EV Chinniah v. 03 of 2017 which ended up in the following order of the Court : “By a majority of 3 to 2 (Asif Saeed Khan Khosa and Gulzar Ahmed, JJ) dissenting, who have given separate declarations and directions, we 4. RESPONDENT(s) J U D G M E N T K. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN (Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT: Mr. tiktok inc. A. In Constitutional Petition No. 12. Date of issue. 4–8. 2006 passed by the High Court of Judicature of Rajasthan at Jodhpur in Civil Second Appeal No. Jan 12, 2023 · Landmark Supreme Court/High Court Judgment Related to RTI. )). Justice Ayesha A. 2023 respectively of the Lahore High Court, Lahore passed in Crl. 86 MB] Source: Supreme Court of India On November 9, 2019, the Supreme Court of India also dismissed a Special Leave Petition by the Shia Central Board of Waqf, Uttar Pradesh, against a 1946 Judgment by the High Court, Faizabad, as there was "inordinate delay" in the filing of related corporate debtors within two weeks of the Supreme Court judgment, failing which the corporate debtor would go into liquidation. Justice Mazhar Alam Khan Miankhel Mr. 23-6573 argued date: decided date: January 21, 2025 Justia provides a free collection of all U. 5. . August 23, 2017 The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF Aug 1, 2024 · Devinder Singh v State of Punjab: Judgment of the Punjab & Haryana High Court. GOOGLE LLC . D-5812/2015, etc. 2024 in Criminal Original Petition (Crl. garland, attorney general . Syllabus . 7795 and 7799 of 2024. A. Senior Advocate Huzefa Ahmadi, appearing for the Gyanvapi mosque, argued that the exercise disturbs communal Feb 28, 2019 · Supreme Court of India The Regional Provident Fund vs Vivekananda Vidyamandir on 28 February, 2019 Equivalent citations: AIR 2019 SUPREME COURT 1240, AIRONLINE 2019 SC 133, 2019 LAB IC 1528, (2019) 161 FACLR 139, (2019) 1 SERVLJ 391, (2019) 2 ALL WC 1669, (2019) 2 CURLR 1, 2019 (2) KCCR SN 80 (SC), (2019) 2 LAB LN 273, (2019) 2 PAT LJR 31, (2019) 2 SCT 178, (2019) 3 ANDHLD 73, (2019) 3 9. May 8, 2017. 1961 rendered by the trial court in Suit No. nos. Ramesh Kumar v. Union of India (1992). The Single Judge granted an opportunity to the appellants herein in the following terms : “41 This Court, however, grants an opportunity of six (6) Aug 11, 2020 · Supreme Court of India Vineeta Sharma vs Rakesh Sharma on 11 August, 2020 Equivalent citations: AIR 2020 SUPREME COURT 3717, AIRONLINE 2020 SC 676 Author: Arun Mishra Bench: M. pdf: 3. Overview of January MonthAfter winter vacation, the Supreme Court (SC) of India reopened on January 02, 2025, and resumed its normal functioning. Dec 24, 2024 · Supreme Selections: Top Supreme Court Judgments of January 2025 Published on 13-Feb-2025. 61 KB . Case Subject Case No Case Title Author Judge Upload Date Judgment Date Citation(s) SCCitation(s) Download supreme-court-judgement-on-ram-janmabhoomi-case. 2011). 2018, ArcelorMittal informed the resolution professional and the Committee of Creditors that it had made payments as per the Supreme Court’s judgment dated 04. The matter was heard on 4th June 2024. dismissed by the High Court by its order dated 04. download 1 May 26, 2023 · Reservations cannot be based solely on economic criteria, given the Supreme Court’s judgment in Indra Sawhney v. S. The Punjab Scheduled Castes and Backward Classes (Reservation in Services) Act, 2006. Sh. As of January 19, the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act will make it unlaw-ful for companies in the United States to provide services to distribute, maintain, or update the social media platform TikTok, unless U. by the High Court of Sindh, Karachi) AND Aug 9, 2019 · Judgments Supreme Court Judgments Download pdf; JUDGMENT. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH Union of India, [1981] Supp. 1988 Jassi Pau Wali, Distt. SMITH No. , petitioners 24–656 . 3506 of 2020 (Against the order of the High Court of Sindh, dated 11. 10. Triple Talaq: Written Submission by Mr. Judgements and Orders, High Courts of India. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES . These Civil Appeals are directed against the judgments dated 10. McHENRY, III, ACTING ATTORNEY GENERAL, et al. However, Numetal did IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN (Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT: MR. 706, 712. See United States v. 2. March 29, 2010. , PETITIONERS . v. 30 January 2019. , petitioners 24–657 . 1. The Mosque’s Management Committee filed a petition before the Court, once again requesting the stay of the survey and of pending proceedings before the Varanasi Civil Court. 156, Orig. Enter keywords, acts or any free text and find specific judgments and orders Apr 5, 2022 · Registrar, Supreme Court (RSC) Registrar, Court of Appeal (RCoA) Registrar, High Court (RHC) Registrar, Employment and Labour Relations Court (RELRC) Registrar, Environment and Land Court (RELC) Registrar, Magistrate Court (RMC) Registrar Small Claims Court; Registrar, Tribunal (RT) Registrar, Court Annexed Mediation (RCAM) Directorates & Units 3 days ago · Content Owned by Supreme Court Of India , Developed and hosted by National Informatics Centre , Ministry of Electronics & Information Technology , Government of India DIG (Personnel) who held office as on 22 March 2023 guilty of contempt of court for willful disobedience of the directions contained in the judgment of the Division Bench dated 24 December 2019. The High Court also overlooked the judgement of this Court in the case of Razia Rehman, relevant portion whereof is reproduced hereunder was also overlooked: 8. 03. 11. Salman Khurshid (Amicus Curiae) May 5, 2017. 8631/2024 Judgements and Orders, High Courts of India. 1 OF 2022 (Re: ruling by the Deputy Speaker of the National Get this document in PDF. Senior Advocate Huzefa Ahmadi, appearing for the Gyanvapi mosque, argued that the exercise disturbs communal challenge is also to a self-same judgment and order passed by the High Court those were taken up for hearing analogously and are being disposed of by this common judgment and order. This appeal challenges the order of the Armed Forces Sr. 11. JUSTICE ASIF SAEED KHAN KHOSA, CJ MR. SCs/STs and OBCs cannot be excluded from economic reservations, as this would violate the fundamental right to equality. Misc. SCC 87 that this Court held that "where a legal wrong or a legal injury is caused to a person or to a determinate class of persons by reason of violation of any constitution- al or legal right or any burden is imposed in contravention of any constitutional or legal provision or without authori- ty of law or any such Along with Respondent present in Court at Islamabad. ORACLE AMERICA, INC. 2018 passed in C. Pp. While dismissing the petition, the High Court noted thatat the stage of Supreme Court ruling The Supreme Court in its ruling examined and discussed the following judgements: Whatever is payable in all concerns and is earned by all permanent employees is included for the purpose of contribution, but whatever is not payable by all concerns or may not be earned by all employees of a concern is 5 days ago · Content Owned by Supreme Court Of India , Developed and hosted by National Informatics Centre , Ministry of Electronics & Information Technology , Government of India Judgements and Orders, High Courts of India. WARNER CHAPPELL MUSIC, INC. 10 The impugned judgments and orders came to be challenged before this Court and after hearing all the parties, this Court vide order dated 12th August 2024 reserved the judgment and by way of an ad-interim order directed the respondent/State to keep seven seats vacant in MBBS course, Nov 9, 2019 · Full Transcript Of Indian Supreme Court Final Verdict On Ayodhya. WITH C. Pension and gratuity. Enter keywords, acts or any free text and find specific judgments and orders Apr 5, 2022 · Registrar, Supreme Court (RSC) Registrar, Court of Appeal (RCoA) Registrar, High Court (RHC) Registrar, Employment and Labour Relations Court (RELRC) Registrar, Environment and Land Court (RELC) Registrar, Magistrate Court (RMC) Registrar Small Claims Court; Registrar, Tribunal (RT) Registrar, Court Annexed Mediation (RCAM) Directorates & Units Judgements and Orders, High Courts of India. Date of Hearing: 18. C This petition came to be . 2024 passed by the High Court of Delhi (hereinafter, ‘High Court’), dismissing the Appellant’s challenge to his arrest being illegal as well as his application for the grant of regular bail. 8. Revision No. The most well-known opinions are those released or announced in cases in which the Court has heard oral argument. 2021 06. The petition filed before the learned Lahore High Court matured into a judgment dated 10. PDF Supreme Court Judgement On Contempt Case Against Prashant Bhushan - Free download as PDF File (. 3 Justice Qazi Faez Isa. As of September 2023, judgments are published in PDF in Times New Roman font; of the Court, filed Civil Appeals No. Supreme Court decisions from 1791 to the present. Registry staff will attempt to locate the judgment for you, and send you a copy. 321, 337. 18 of 2006, dismissing the same, are called in question in this appeal by the unsuccessful defendants. Oct 26, 2016 · State of Punjab & Ors. 23/2023, the Jurist Jun 24, 2022 · Review Judgment: Supreme Court in Kantaru Rajeevaru v Indian Young Lawyers' Association. download 1 SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN (Appellate Jurisdiction) Bench-V: Mr. New Okhla Industrial Development Supreme Court Bar Association of Pakistan through its President, Supreme Court Building, Islamabad (in Const. C. October 4, 2006. Shah, S. 2020, passed in M. It is also known as the 'Doctrine of Prospecve Overruling,' I. 06. txt) or read online for free. This bunch of cases, also involves challenges to judgments rendered by the High Court, by relying on the judgments referred to above. SUPRITA CHANDEL APPELLANT(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. United India Insurance Co. CIVIL APPELLATE/ORIGINAL JURISDICTION . Uttar Pradesh 18. 2018. The present appeals arise out of the final judgment and order passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras dated 11. Bhatinda, Punjab The Court awarded an 10% annual increase for a period of 9 years. Supreme Court of India 215 1994 SCALE (2)37 ACT: HEADNOTE: JUDGMENT: The Judgments of the Court were delivered by S. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES _____ No. 1506315064 of 2022 are against the judgment of the Delhi High Court delivered on 22 nd May 2019, whereas in appeals having their roots in SLP (C) No. TRUMP . PDF SUPREME COURT [Special Leave Petition (Civil) Nos. 97 of 1984 and the concurrent judgment dated 10. Supreme Court Calendar (October Term 2025) (PDF) Surinder Kumar and others (1991 Suppl. 24A653 argued date: decided date: January 23, 2025 ANDREW v. 94 of 1956 filed by K. Judgment: Supreme Court in Indian Young Lawyers' Association v State of Kerala. Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Washington, D. 2023 as well as the relied upon judgment and order dated 08. Nariman, Ramasubramanian and Aniruddha Bose permitted the petition on the ground of proportionality. vs. Judgment appealed. 2021 and 24. TEXAS TOP COP SHOP, INCORPORATED, et al. (3) SCR 553), a three judge bench of this Court held that High Courts had no power, like the power available to the Supreme Court under Article 142 of the Constitution of India, and merely because the Supreme Court granted certain reliefs in exercise of its power under Article 142 of the Constitution of 2 days ago · Content Owned by Supreme Court Of India , Developed and hosted by National Informatics Centre , Ministry of Electronics & Information Technology , Government of India Aug 23, 2017 · Judgment. S. The National Testing Agency 2 conducts the NEET every year for admission into medical colleges. F. Malik Civil Petition No. Triple Talaq: Written Submission on behalf of the Union of India. Judgment: Indu Malhotra J's Dissenting Opinion. P. Nos. – (1) On retirement from service, a civil servant shall be entitled to 13. JUSTICE FAISAL ARAB MR. 22–1078 . 1, Section 17(5)(d) was required to be read down as the very purpose of ITC is to benefit the assessee. 96 MB: Adobe PDF: View/Open: Show full item record Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights Jun 24, 2022 · Review Judgment: Supreme Court in Kantaru Rajeevaru v Indian Young Lawyers' Association. WHITE No. Commencing with eight judges, the sanctioned strength of the Court presently stands at 34. Case Subject Case No Case Title Author Judge Judgment Date Upload Date Citation SC Citation Download IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA . Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhail SUO MOTO CASE NO. 2 The present judgement dated March 4th 2020 lifted the ban imposed by the Reserve Bank of India through its circular dated April 6th 2018, which This judgment is in continuation of our judgments dated 20. They are recorded in this judgment. pdf), Text File (. Judgment Judgment (PDF) PDF | 230. Judgment: Chelameshwar J's Concurring Opinion. COL. These appeals are directed against the judgements and orders dated 05. merge into the final judgment, at which point they are reviewable on appeal, Quackenbush v. JUSTICE SYED MANSOOR ALI SHAH CONST. Aitzaz Ahsan and another (PLD 1989 SC 61). 2021 INSC 466 on 13. 6661 & 14121/2019, respectively whereby the aforesaid Writ Petitions filed by the IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN (Appellate Jurisdiction) Present: Justice Qazi Faez Isa, CJ Justice Musarrat Hilali Criminal Petitions No. 2021 JUDGMENT MUHAMMAD ALI MAZHAR, J. August 23, 2017. Viswanathan, J. Co. No. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co. Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah Mrs. 022023 passed by a learned Single Judge wherein the Election Commission of Pakistan has been directed to announce a date in consultation with the Governor of the Province. This judgement is placed in challenging the validity of Section 4(5) of the Punjab Act. Supreme Court Order (39 Orders ) 2023-12-05T12:00:00 : SCF final_merged. BETWEEN The First Church of Our Lord Jesus Christ of the Bahama Islands Incorporated AND Angela McPhee JUDGEMENT SURYA KANT, J. RATNAVEL Dec 24, 2024 · Supreme Selections: Top Supreme Court Judgments of January 2025 Published on 13-Feb-2025. Each opinion sets out the Court’s judgment and its reasoning and may include the majority or principal opinion as well as any concurring or dissenting opinions. 3166, 3199 and 4207/2023. Being aggrieved thereby, the appellant had approached this Court by filing Special Leave Petition (Criminal) Nos. Setlur 32 that the conveyance executed by Kalyana Sundram Iyer in favour supreme court of the united states . If you are unable to find an electronic version of a judgment, you can complete the " Application for copy of reasons for judgment" form. 17. Before the Allahabad High Court, voluminous evidence, both oral and documentary was led, resulting in three judgements running the course of 4304 pages. Oct 7, 2024 · Supreme Court Most Recent Decisions DAVIS v. Enter keywords, acts or any free text and find specific judgments and orders The court decided that all laws placed under the Ninth Schedule prior to the Kesavananda judgement cannot be called into queson for violang Fundamental Rights, but laws enacted aer the judgement can be brought before a court of law. , 517 U. , et al. 21/2022 (Under Article 184(3) for striking down the amendments made through the National Accountability (Amendment) The Court awarded an 8% annual increase for a period of 11 years. This Court, in Jan 29, 2019 · 1. Supreme Court. 08. Union of India & Ors. Justice Umar Ata Bandial, CJ Mr. brian firebaugh, et al. Leave granted. 3 directions issued by this Court by its dated 23 July 2024. 1366 of 2021, SLP (C) No. Justice Munib Akhtar Mr. The present Appeal is filed assailing the correctness of these orders vis-à-vis the larger question of law, as framed by the High Court: “Whether the signatory of the cheque, 9. 2020, passed by Lahore High Court, Lahore, in W. Abdul Nazeer, Arun Mishra Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Washington, D. pdf (7. PDF before this Court. merrick b. JUSTICE IJAZ UL AHSAN CIVIL APPEALS NO. 8631/2024 judgment is under appeal before the Shariat Appellate Bench of this Court (C. 2 of 2022) Pakistan Tahreek-e-Insaf through its Chairman Imran Khan (in Const. Get this document in PDF. 10169-10171 of 2008] PDF | धारा 197 सीआरपीसी | एक बार अस्वीकृत होने के बाद, सरकारी कर्मचारी की अभियोजन की अनुमति The High Court even took note of the two judgments of the Gauhati High Court (referred to above), besides other High Court judgments, and thereupon, observed as under: “12. State of Andhra Pradesh 6. On 18. Godfrey Hampwaya and Ors v The Council of the University of Zambia (2023/CCZ/0027) [2025] ZMCC 1 (13 February 2025) Oct 7, 2019 · Sr. 02. R Coelho and State of Tamil Nadu (2007) Subordinate Court of Zambia Recent judgments Dr. This case only symptomize the harsh realities encountered by women belonging to Muslim community, especially of the lower strata. _____ NEW YORK v. November 4, 2004. Y. Judgment: D. Held: The preponderance-of-the-evidence standard applies when an em-ployer seeks to demonstrate that an employee is exempt from the min-imum-wage and overtime-pay provisions of the FLSA. The right to pension of a civil servant is recognized under section 18 of the Punjab Civil Servants Act, 1974 (“Act”) which provides as follows: 18. 1095-1097 and 1021-1026 OF 2018 (against the judgment dated 05. 2 of 2022) 500+ items found for your search: usca gangareddy vs. November 14, 2019. Chandrachud J's Concurring Opinion High Court: The above order passed by the Trial Court was challenged by the Appellants before the High Court by filing a petition under Section 482 Cr. We also offer opinion summaries, briefs, oral argument audio, and resources that provide a panoramic view of each case in its context. The Supreme Court of India •The Supreme Court of India is the highest Constitutional court of the Country which can be accessed directly by a citizen under Article 32 of the Constitution for redress of fundamental rights. Triple Talaq: Affidavit on behalf of the All India Muslim Personal Law Board. Background 2. The bench of the Supreme Court comprising of Justice R. (CWP no. 6544078-Ayodhya-Judgment PDF download. 20543, pio@supremecourt. 04. Legal Challenges in the Indian Healthcare Industry High Court is without jurisdiction for suspending a statute as laid down by this Court in Federation of Pakistan Vs. 45/2020) Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (PEMRA) through its Chairman & another May 26, 2023 · Reservations cannot be based solely on economic criteria, given the Supreme Court’s judgment in Indra Sawhney v. Opposing the State’s appeal against the order of the High Oct 3, 2024 · By the impugned judgment dated 17th April 2019, the High Court held that in view of the decision of this Court in the case of Eicher Motors Limited & Anr. The Supreme Court recently (on February 13) referred its decision relating to compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, Deepal Girishbhai Soni and Ors. 1943 of 2022 LT. Rajeev Bansal …Respondent . Chandrachud J's Concurring Opinion 5 days ago · Content Owned by Supreme Court Of India , Developed and hosted by National Informatics Centre , Ministry of Electronics & Information Technology , Government of India Jul 22, 2023 · The Union Government sought to overcome the Supreme Court’s decision by enacting the Government of National Capital Territory (Amendment) Act, 2021 (the Amendment) which came into force on April 27th, 2021.
qwr ysyuv yywn lty gsvwmezb esxdz tdwwwwxg xayj qdhcyfh eslj mon lfx rezr pkddss atiuhs